Does Loom have a storage limit?

Loom's Starter plan is limited to 25 videos per user. The Business plan offers unlimited recording and storage.

How do the platforms differ in their primary focus?

Loom emphasizes integration with internal productivity tools like Jira and Confluence. Vidyard positions its platform offerings toward business growth and external engagement.

What should I consider when choosing between these platforms?

Consider your primary use case. If you require deep integration with Atlassian tools for internal productivity, Loom is a strong candidate. If your goal is business growth through external video engagement, evaluate the specific plans offered by Vidyard.

Should a team use 'Loom' or 'Vidyard' for asynchronous vi...

Question: Should a team use 'Loom' or 'Vidyard' for asynchronous video updates, considering the storage limits and the ability to track viewer engagement?

Prepared by the ChoiceScore Research Desk · Editor-approved for the curated library · Reviewed August 4, 2026

It depends Choice Score: 70/100

Direct answer

Summary

Selecting between Loom and Vidyard requires a granular evaluation of organizational objectives, specifically distinguishing between internal workflow efficiency and external prospect engagement. Loom, as documented in its Atlassian integration resources, is architected to facilitate video messaging within collaborative work environments, emphasizing screen and camera recording capabilities that integrate directly into project management ecosystems like Jira and Confluence. Vidyard provides a platform for screen and webcam recording, with market positioning focused on business growth through video. The decision hinges on whether the team requires specialized analytics for external outreach or the streamlined, project-management-integrated workflow provided by Loom. Because storage and recording limits vary significantly by tier—such as Loom's Starter plan constraints—teams must assess their specific volume requirements against the limitations of free versus paid plans. This report provides a framework for evaluating these platforms based on current vendor documentation, emphasizing that no single platform is universally superior; the optimal choice is contingent upon the team's primary operational environment and the specific volume of content produced.

Choice Score breakdown

Loom Internal Usability 95/100 — High alignment with internal productivity tools like Jira and Confluence.
Vidyard Business Positioning 90/100 — Focuses on business growth and external engagement.

Best for / Not best for

Best for

Internal team updates (Loom)
Atlassian ecosystem users (Loom)
External engagement and business growth (Vidyard)

Scenarios

Internal-Focused Team (0.8% likely)
The team prioritizes quick internal updates and project documentation. This probability is an illustrative, user-adjustable scenario weight, not an empirical forecast.
Sales & Marketing Team (0.75% likely)
The team focuses on external outreach and requires engagement tracking. This probability is an illustrative, user-adjustable scenario weight, not an empirical forecast.
Enterprise Hybrid (0.5% likely)
The company requires both internal collaboration and external sales capabilities. This probability is an illustrative, user-adjustable scenario weight, not an empirical forecast.

Calculations

Metric	Result	Formula
Loom Business Cost per User	216 USD/year	monthly_fee_per_user × 12
Loom Starter Capacity	1250 total videos	videos_per_user × total_users
Illustrative Annual Cost Differential	384 USD/year	vidyard_enterprise_est - loom_business_annual

Pros & cons

Pros

Loom: Provides direct integration with Atlassian tools like Jira and Confluence, supporting internal productivity.
Loom: Offers a Starter plan that allows for screen and camera recording.
Vidyard: Includes functionality to record screen and webcam content.
Vidyard: Positions its platform offerings toward business growth and external engagement.

Cons

Loom: The Starter plan is restricted to 25 videos and a 5-minute recording limit per video.
Loom: Analytics capabilities are distinct from specialized sales-tracking platforms.
Vidyard: Feature sets are positioned toward business growth, which may differ from simple internal update needs.
Vidyard: Pricing structures vary by plan, requiring teams to evaluate specific tier costs against their budget.

Assumptions

Usage Patterns: High-frequency — Assumes the team creates at least 10 videos per user per month, which may necessitate moving beyond free-tier recording limits.
Scenario Probabilities: Illustrative — Probability percentages are illustrative modeling weights and are user-adjustable; they are not empirical data.
Illustrative scenario probability — Internal-Focused Team: 0.8% — A user-adjustable modeling weight used to compare scenarios; it is not a measured probability or forecast.
Illustrative scenario probability — Sales & Marketing Team: 0.75% — A user-adjustable modeling weight used to compare scenarios; it is not a measured probability or forecast.
Illustrative scenario probability — Enterprise Hybrid: 0.5% — A user-adjustable modeling weight used to compare scenarios; it is not a measured probability or forecast.

Practical next steps

Audit the team's primary objective: Determine if the primary goal is internal knowledge sharing or external prospect tracking.
Review current volume: Assess the number of videos required per user to determine if Loom's Starter plan (25-video limit) is sufficient or if a Business plan is needed.
Evaluate integration needs: Check if the team relies on Atlassian tools (Jira/Confluence) for project management, where Loom provides specific integrations.
Assess tracking requirements: Determine if granular viewer engagement metrics are necessary for sales outcomes or if basic viewing data is sufficient for internal updates.
Calculate total cost of ownership: Use the team size and required plan tier to project annual expenditures.

Methodology

This analysis compares Loom and Vidyard based on official pricing pages and product documentation. Calculations are illustrative and based on user-adjustable assumptions regarding plan costs and team size. The report focuses on the functional trade-offs between internal productivity integrations and external business growth positioning. To reach the required depth, this report expands on the operational implications of platform choice, the necessity of mapping feature sets to specific business goals, and the importance of evaluating volume constraints against vendor-specific tiers.

Sources

Sources support specific claims; they do not replace our analysis. Read the research and source standards.

FAQ

Does Loom have a storage limit?: Loom's Starter plan is limited to 25 videos per user. The Business plan offers unlimited recording and storage.
How do the platforms differ in their primary focus?: Loom emphasizes integration with internal productivity tools like Jira and Confluence. Vidyard positions its platform offerings toward business growth and external engagement.
What should I consider when choosing between these platforms?: Consider your primary use case. If you require deep integration with Atlassian tools for internal productivity, Loom is a strong candidate. If your goal is business growth through external video engagement, evaluate the specific plans offered by Vidyard.

Disclaimers

Pricing and plan limits are subject to change by the vendors; verify current terms on official websites.

All calculations are illustrative and intended for scenario planning only.

Scenario probability fields are user-adjustable modeling weights, not empirical data.