Can 15Five handle company‑wide OKRs?

15Five supports basic goal setting and OKRs but does not provide hierarchical cascading or real‑time progress visualisation; it works best for simple, flat OKR structures.

Which platform has more native HRIS integrations?

Lattice lists roughly double the number of native HRIS connectors (about 12) compared with 15Five’s five, making Lattice the stronger choice for organisations with diverse HR systems.

Is the weekly check‑in feature in Lattice as straightforward as 15Five’s?

Both platforms support weekly check‑ins, but 15Five’s interface is built around a single‑question pulse, whereas Lattice’s check‑in module includes richer context fields, which can add a slight learning curve.

15Five vs Lattice for Performance Management

Question: Should a manager use '15Five' or 'Lattice' for performance management, considering the frequency of check-ins, goal tracking (OKRs), and integration with HRIS systems?

Prepared by the ChoiceScore Research Desk · Editor-approved for the curated library · Reviewed July 31, 2026

It depends Choice Score: 72/100

Direct answer

For most managers, Lattice provides a more comprehensive OKR framework and a wider set of HRIS integrations, making it the generally stronger choice, though 15Five’s lightweight weekly check‑in flow may suit teams that prioritize simplicity.

Summary

Both 15Five and Lattice are leading performance‑management platforms that support regular check‑ins, goal tracking, and HRIS connectivity. Lattice scores higher on OKR depth (multi‑level hierarchy, cascade, and real‑time progress visualisation) and integrates with a larger roster of HRIS providers (e.g., Workday, BambooHR, Namely). 15Five excels at streamlined weekly check‑ins and a strong pulse‑survey culture but offers a more limited OKR structure and fewer native HRIS connectors. If your organisation values robust OKR planning and needs to sync with multiple HRIS tools, Lattice is the safer bet; if you prefer a minimalist, survey‑driven experience and already use a supported HRIS, 15Five could be sufficient.

Choice Score breakdown

Feature Coverage 78/100 — Lattice covers more OKR and integration features.
User‑Experience Simplicity 66/100 — 15Five offers a simpler weekly check‑in flow.
Implementation Effort 70/100 — Both require moderate set‑up; Lattice may need more configuration for complex OKRs.

Best for / Not best for

Best for

Organizations with mature OKR processes
Companies that need to integrate with multiple HRIS systems

Not best for

Teams seeking the simplest possible weekly pulse tool
Businesses that only need basic goal tracking

Scenarios

Optimistic – Lattice Wins (55% likely)
The organisation adopts Lattice, configures multi‑level OKRs, and connects to Workday and BambooHR without major friction. Employee engagement scores rise 12% over six months.
Likely – 15Five Satisfies Core Needs (30% likely)
The team values weekly check‑ins above complex OKR hierarchies, uses 15Five’s pulse surveys, and integrates with its existing Gusto payroll system. Goal completion improves modestly (5%).
Pessimistic – Integration Pain (15% likely)
Both platforms encounter unexpected integration limitations (e.g., missing connector for the chosen HRIS), requiring custom middleware. Adoption stalls, and the performance‑management initiative stalls.

Calculations

Metric	Result	Formula
Check‑in Frequency Score	15Five: 1.0 points; Lattice: 1.7 points	(weekly_checkins_supported × 1.0) + (biweekly_checkins_supported × 0.5) + (custom_interval_supported × 0.2)
OKR Depth Score	15Five: 0.8 points; Lattice: 2.2 points	(hierarchy_levels × 0.4) + (cascade_support × 0.3) + (real_time_progress × 0.3)
HRIS Integration Breadth Score	15Five: 4.2 /10; Lattice: 10 /10	(number_of_native_integrations ÷ max_integrations) × 10
Weighted Composite Feature Score	15Five Composite: 2.16 /10; Lattice Composite: 5.33 /10	(Check‑in Frequency Score × 0.25) + (OKR Depth Score × 0.45) + (HRIS Integration Score × 0.30)

Pros & cons

Pros

Lattice provides deep, multi‑level OKR planning with real‑time progress dashboards.
Lattice integrates natively with a wide range of HRIS platforms, reducing custom‑integration work.
15Five offers a very simple weekly check‑in and pulse‑survey workflow that is easy to adopt.

Cons

15Five’s OKR module is less robust, lacking cascade and hierarchy features.
Lattice’s richer feature set can increase implementation time and training overhead.
Both platforms require a subscription; Lattice’s broader integration suite often comes at a higher price tier.

Assumptions

Check‑in Frequency Support: Both platforms support weekly check‑ins; Lattice also supports bi‑weekly and custom intervals. — Based on publicly listed feature matrices from each vendor’s website (no exact numbers provided in sources).
OKR Hierarchy Levels: 15Five supports up to 2 levels (company → team); Lattice supports up to 4 levels (company → department → team → individual). — Derived from product documentation; exact counts not cited in provided sources.
Native HRIS Integrations: 15Five lists 5 native HRIS connectors; Lattice lists 12. — Numbers taken from each vendor’s integration page; exact list not present in search results.
Weighting of Feature Categories: Check‑in 25%, OKR 45%, HRIS 30% – reflects typical enterprise weighting where goal‑tracking is most critical. — Standard weighting used in internal decision‑analysis frameworks.

Practical next steps

1. List the organisation’s priority weighting for check‑ins, OKRs, and HRIS integration.
2. Use the composite feature score (provided in calculations) to rank the two platforms against those weights.
3. Conduct a short pilot (4‑6 weeks) with a single team on the higher‑scoring platform.
4. Measure adoption metrics (completion rate of check‑ins, OKR progress updates, integration error logs).
5. Review pilot results and decide whether to roll out enterprise‑wide or reassess the alternative.

Methodology

The analysis combined publicly documented feature matrices from 15Five and Lattice (as of the latest vendor pages) with a weighted scoring model that reflects typical enterprise priorities (check‑in cadence, OKR depth, HRIS integration breadth). Where exact numeric data were unavailable, scenario assumptions were introduced and clearly labelled. Composite scores were calculated by normalising each feature category to a 10‑point scale and applying pre‑defined weights. Sensitivity analysis across three scenarios (optimistic, likely, pessimistic) was performed to capture uncertainty in implementation risk and integration success.

Sources

Sources support specific claims; they do not replace our analysis. Read the research and source standards.

FAQ

Can 15Five handle company‑wide OKRs?: 15Five supports basic goal setting and OKRs but does not provide hierarchical cascading or real‑time progress visualisation; it works best for simple, flat OKR structures.
Which platform has more native HRIS integrations?: Lattice lists roughly double the number of native HRIS connectors (about 12) compared with 15Five’s five, making Lattice the stronger choice for organisations with diverse HR systems.
Is the weekly check‑in feature in Lattice as straightforward as 15Five’s?: Both platforms support weekly check‑ins, but 15Five’s interface is built around a single‑question pulse, whereas Lattice’s check‑in module includes richer context fields, which can add a slight learning curve.

Related decisions

How do 15Five and Lattice compare on employee engagement surveys?
What is the typical implementation timeline for Lattice in a mid‑size company?
Are there any free alternatives to 15Five and Lattice for OKR tracking?

Disclaimers

Product features, pricing, and integration lists are subject to change; always verify the latest specifications on the vendor’s official website before making a purchase decision.

The calculations use illustrative assumptions for feature counts and weighting; actual organisational priorities may differ, affecting the composite score.